The previous article, The Highest Principles, derived six principles from examining failed systems across specific domains. This article goes deeper. Before religion, before economics, before governance - what does the species itself require? Not what we wish it required. What the evidence shows.
Anthropology has studied human societies across every climate, continent, and level of complexity for over 150 years. The findings are remarkably consistent. Certain structural features appear in every society that lasted. Certain violations destroy every society that commits them. These are not cultural preferences. They are species-level requirements.
What follows is derived from empirical observation - not ideology, not philosophy, not religion. The sources are named. The evidence is testable. The principles are falsifiable.
PRINCIPLE I: RECIPROCITY IS THE FOUNDATION
What the Evidence Shows
Marcel Mauss, in The Gift (1925), documented something that has since been confirmed by every field study of human societies: reciprocity is the fundamental organizing principle of human social life.
Every human society ever studied - from Trobriand Islanders to Wall Street traders - operates on some form of reciprocal exchange. The forms vary enormously (gift economies, barter, market trade, mutual aid, potlatch, tithing, taxation). The principle does not vary at all.
Mauss identified three obligations that appear in every culture:
- The obligation to give - hoarding without sharing is universally punished
- The obligation to receive - refusing a gift is an act of hostility
- The obligation to reciprocate - receiving without returning breaks the bond
The gift is not merely an economic act. It is, as Mauss called it, a “total social phenomenon” - simultaneously economic, political, religious, legal, and moral. When you give, a part of you travels with the gift. The Maori called this the hau - the spirit of the thing given. The bond created through reciprocal exchange is so powerful that it creates an “identity of persons.”
[Source: Wikipedia: The Gift, Mauss, Marcel. The Gift (1925)]
What Breaks When This Is Violated
When reciprocity is replaced by one-directional extraction - when one group takes without returning - the social fabric disintegrates.
- Slavery: The ultimate violation of reciprocity. Labor extracted, nothing returned. Every slave society eventually collapsed or was overthrown.
- Colonial extraction: Resources taken from colonies without proportional return. Every colonial empire fell.
- Late-stage financialization: Value extracted from productive economy through financial instruments that return nothing to producers. Currently producing visible social disintegration.
- Algorithmic attention extraction: Social media extracts attention (the most valuable human resource) and returns dopamine hits. The resulting loneliness epidemic is a reciprocity failure.
The Principle
Every exchange between humans must contain reciprocity - the return of value proportional to what was received. Systems that extract without reciprocating are consuming their own foundation.
This is not a moral claim. It is an engineering specification. A bridge built on one-directional force collapses. A society built on one-directional extraction collapses. The timeline varies. The physics does not.
PRINCIPLE II: THE LEVELING MECHANISM MUST EXIST
What the Evidence Shows
Christopher Boehm, in Hierarchy in the Forest (1999), documented a phenomenon he called the reverse dominance hierarchy. In egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies - which represent 95% of human evolutionary history - the group actively, deliberately, and sometimes violently suppressed any individual who attempted to accumulate excessive power or resources.
The mechanisms were universal across hunter-gatherer cultures:
| Mechanism | How it works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Ridicule | Public mockery of anyone showing arrogance | The !Kung San practice of “insulting the meat” - a successful hunter’s kill is deliberately belittled |
| Gossip | Social information sharing that monitors and constrains behavior | Universal in all studied societies |
| Disobedience | Collective refusal to follow would-be dominators | Documented across all continents |
| Ostracism | Social exclusion of those who violate egalitarian norms | Universal punishment mechanism |
| Execution | Killing of persistent tyrants by coalition of subordinates | Documented by Boehm in multiple societies |
This is not utopian speculation. This is what humans DID for approximately 290,000 of the 300,000 years our species has existed. Egalitarianism was not a philosophical ideal. It was an actively enforced social technology.
Boehm’s key insight: human beings are not naturally egalitarian. We carry the same dominance instincts as other great apes. What makes us unique is that we developed collective mechanisms to suppress individual dominance. The hierarchy didn’t disappear. It reversed: the group dominated the would-be alpha.
Hunter-gatherers were, as the research shows, “obsessed with personal autonomy” and “hyper-alert to any behavior that threatens their own autonomy.” Leaders were tolerated only as long as they served the group. The moment they tried to coerce, accumulate, or elevate themselves, the community pushed back.
[Source: Rob Henderson, University of Chicago/Boehm 1993, Psychology Today]
What Breaks When This Is Violated
Civilization began approximately 10,000 years ago with agriculture. Agriculture created surplus. Surplus created the possibility of accumulation. Accumulation created hierarchy. And for the first time in 290,000 years, the leveling mechanisms were overwhelmed.
Every subsequent concentration of power - from pharaohs to feudalism to corporate monopoly to the current Technate - represents a FAILURE of the leveling mechanism. Not because concentration is new (alpha behavior is primate-ancient) but because the COUNTERFORCE that suppressed it for 97% of human history was disabled.
The leveling mechanisms didn’t disappear entirely. They were transformed:
- Ridicule became satire and free press
- Gossip became transparency and accountability journalism
- Disobedience became civil rights movements and labor unions
- Ostracism became elections and impeachment
- Execution became revolution (a destructive last resort)
The current crisis: these modern leveling mechanisms are being systematically degraded. Free press replaced by algorithmic feeds. Transparency undermined by classified operations. Labor unions weakened to 10% membership. Elections captured by unlimited spending (Citizens United). When all leveling mechanisms fail simultaneously, history shows only one remains: revolution. Which destroys everything, including itself.
The Principle
Every human system must contain active leveling mechanisms that prevent excessive concentration of power, resources, or status. These mechanisms are not luxuries. They are 290,000 years of species-level engineering. Disabling them is disabling the immune system.
PRINCIPLE III: THE 150 BOUNDARY
What the Evidence Shows
Robin Dunbar, in research spanning 30+ years, demonstrated that the human neocortex imposes a cognitive limit on the number of stable social relationships any individual can maintain: approximately 150 people. This is Dunbar’s Number.
The evidence is remarkably consistent across time and culture:
- Neolithic farming villages: ~150 people
- Roman army centuries: 80-150
- Anglo-Saxon villages (Domesday Book, 1086 AD): ~150
- Hutterite communities split at ~150
- Military companies worldwide: ~150
- Christmas card networks: ~150
- Phone contact networks: ~150
- Facebook meaningful interaction networks: ~150
Beyond 150, humans cannot track relationships using personal knowledge alone. They require abstractions: laws, institutions, currencies, religions, bureaucracies. These abstractions allow cooperation at scales of millions or billions - but at a cost.
The cost: every abstraction introduces the possibility of manipulation. A law can be written to serve the powerful. A currency can be debased. A religion can be weaponized. A bureaucracy can be captured. Below 150, you know who is cheating because you know everyone. Above 150, cheating becomes invisible without institutional detection systems.
Dunbar also documented a fractal scaling pattern: 5 (intimate support) -> 15 (close friends) -> 50 (good friends) -> 150 (meaningful relationships) -> 500 (acquaintances) -> 1,500 (faces you recognize) -> 5,000 (names you know). Each layer is approximately 3x the previous.
[Source: Wikipedia: Dunbar’s Number, The Conversation: Dunbar]
What Breaks When This Is Violated
Two failure modes:
Failure Mode A: Scaling without Abstraction. Attempting to run a large-scale society on personal relationships alone. Result: tribal warfare, in-group/out-group violence, inability to cooperate beyond the band. This is the failure mode of isolationism, ethnonationalism, and “return to village” fantasies.
Failure Mode B: Abstraction without Accountability. Building large-scale institutions that operate beyond anyone’s personal understanding or oversight. Result: bureaucratic capture, financial extraction, surveillance states. This is the failure mode of empires, global corporations, and the current Technate.
The healthy zone is the tension between the two: large enough to cooperate at scale, small enough that the abstractions remain accountable to actual humans. Every successful institution in history maintained this tension. Every failed one resolved it - either by becoming too small (and getting conquered) or too abstract (and collapsing from internal corruption).
The Principle
Human systems must scale through abstractions (laws, institutions, currencies) but every abstraction must remain accountable to groups small enough to maintain personal trust (~150). Abstractions that escape human-scale accountability become instruments of extraction.
This is why Ostrom’s commons work matters. She documented that successful commons governance requires: clear boundaries, proportional costs/benefits, collective choice arrangements, monitoring by participants (not distant authorities), graduated sanctions, fast conflict resolution, local autonomy, and nested governance. Every one of these principles maps onto maintaining human-scale accountability within larger systems.
[Source: Ostrom Design Principles]
PRINCIPLE IV: THE ECONOMY MUST BE EMBEDDED
What the Evidence Shows
Karl Polanyi, in The Great Transformation (1944), documented that for most of human history, economic activity was embedded in social relationships. You traded with people you knew. Your reputation constrained your behavior. The market was a place, not a system.
Starting in 18th-century England, something unprecedented happened: the economy was disembedded from social relationships and made into an autonomous, self-regulating system. Land, labor, and money were commodified - turned into things to be bought and sold on markets. Polanyi called these “fictitious commodities” because they are not produced for sale: land is nature, labor is human life, money is a social convention.
The result was, as Polanyi documented, social catastrophe. Communities were destroyed. Traditional safety nets dissolved. Workers were treated as interchangeable units of production. The environment was treated as an infinite resource.
But Polanyi also documented the double movement: every time the market was disembedded from society, society fought back. Labor laws, environmental regulations, welfare states, trade unions - all were forms of “re-embedding” the economy back into social relationships.
The double movement is not a political preference. It is a structural dynamic. Push the economy away from social control, and society will pull it back - through regulation, through revolution, or through collapse.
[Source: Wikipedia: The Great Transformation, Wikipedia: Double Movement]
What Breaks When This Is Violated
Every major economic crisis in modern history is a disembedding event:
| Crisis | What was disembedded | Social response (re-embedding) |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial Revolution (1760-1840) | Labor from community | Labor unions, Factory Acts, welfare |
| Great Depression (1929) | Finance from reality | New Deal, Glass-Steagall, social security |
| Neoliberal era (1980-present) | Everything from everything | Deregulation, globalization, financialization |
| 2008 crash | Housing from human need | Bailouts for banks, austerity for people (failed re-embedding) |
| Current era (2020s) | Identity from body (biometrics), labor from humans (AI), money from production (QE) | Double movement in progress: populism left AND right are both forms of attempted re-embedding |
The current situation is the most extreme disembedding in human history. Not just labor from community or finance from reality - but IDENTITY from body (World ID), INTELLIGENCE from humanity (AI), MONEY from production (QE/financialization), and GOVERNANCE from consent (DOGE/Technate).
Polanyi’s framework predicts: the double movement will come. Society will attempt to re-embed. The question is whether re-embedding happens through democratic reform, authoritarian reaction, or systemic collapse.
The Principle
The economy must remain embedded in social relationships. Every disembedding - treating land as commodity, labor as resource, money as product, identity as data - generates a counter-movement. Systems that resist re-embedding will face increasingly violent correction.
PRINCIPLE V: ANTI-STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED
What the Evidence Shows
Victor Turner, studying the Ndembu of Zambia and later extending his findings to all human societies, documented that social life requires periodic experiences of communitas - moments where normal hierarchies and distinctions are temporarily dissolved and people encounter each other as equals.
Turner called this anti-structure - not the destruction of structure but its temporary suspension. Liminality - the threshold state between what was and what will be - is where communitas occurs. The three stages he identified: separation (leaving normal roles), liminality (the in-between state of equality and openness), reaggregation (returning to structure, transformed).
Every human society Turner studied - and every subsequent study has confirmed - requires these liminal spaces:
| Form | How it works | What it provides |
|---|---|---|
| Rituals of passage | Puberty rites, marriage, funerals | Marks transitions; renews communal bonds |
| Festivals and carnivals | Temporary inversion of hierarchy (king for a day, Carnival, Saturnalia) | Release valve for social pressure; reminder that hierarchy is constructed |
| Pilgrimage | Leaving home, encountering strangers as equals on the road | Shared vulnerability creates bonds across social divides |
| Collective effervescence (Durkheim) | Shared intense experiences (dance, music, sports, protest) | Generates group solidarity and individual meaning |
| Deliberate retreat | Monastic traditions, sabbaticals, vision quests | Space for reflection and renewal outside productive pressure |
Turner’s key insight: the dialectic of structure and anti-structure is the engine of cultural creativity. Structure organizes society to meet material needs but draws distinctions between people. Anti-structure dissolves those distinctions and renews the sense of common humanity. Both are required. Neither is sufficient alone.
[Source: Britannica: Turner, Wikipedia: Liminality]
What Breaks When This Is Violated
Societies that suppress anti-structure become brittle:
- Soviet Union: All gathering was political; no communitas permitted outside state-approved channels. Result: atomized individuals with no authentic social bonds. Collapsed from within.
- Corporate “always-on” culture: No sabbath, no carnival, no transition. Result: burnout epidemic, loss of meaning, quiet quitting.
- Digital mediation of all experience: Social media replaces embodied gathering. Algorithm-mediated “connection” lacks the vulnerability and equality required for communitas. Result: loneliness epidemic despite unprecedented “connectivity.”
- Loss of ritual: Modern secular societies have largely eliminated rites of passage. No structured transition from childhood to adulthood, no collective mourning rituals, no seasonal renewal. Result: identity confusion, perpetual adolescence, inability to mark and integrate change.
The Principle
Every human system must provide regular spaces of anti-structure - experiences where hierarchy is temporarily suspended and people encounter each other as equals. Without these, social pressure accumulates without release, creativity dies, and the system becomes brittle enough to shatter.
This is not a luxury. It is structural maintenance. A bridge that is never relieved of stress fatigue breaks. A society that is never relieved of hierarchical pressure breaks.
PRINCIPLE VI: THE STRANGER MUST BE POSSIBLE
What the Evidence Shows
Every human society must answer a fundamental question: what do we do with people who are not us?
The anthropological record shows a clear pattern: societies that were completely closed to outsiders stagnated and died. Societies that were completely open to outsiders dissolved and disappeared. The successful ones maintained permeable boundaries - open enough to admit new ideas, genes, trade, and perspectives; closed enough to maintain coherent identity, values, and mutual obligation.
This maps onto biological systems. A cell with no membrane dissolves into its environment. A cell with an impermeable membrane cannot receive nutrients and dies. Life requires a selectively permeable boundary.
The mechanisms for managing the stranger vary:
| Mechanism | How it works |
|---|---|
| Hospitality codes | Sacred obligation to shelter and feed travelers (Greek xenia, Bedouin diyafa, Jewish hachnasat orchim). Universal across cultures. |
| Trading protocols | Formalized rules for exchange with outsiders. Creates value without requiring full trust. |
| Adoption / integration rituals | Structured pathways for outsiders to become insiders. Marriage, citizenship, conversion. |
| Boundary maintenance | Clear distinction between who is “in” and who is “outside,” enforced through language, custom, territory. |
The key insight: the stranger is both threat and gift. Every innovation, every genetic renewal, every perspective shift enters through the stranger. Every disease, every invasion, every cultural dissolution also enters through the stranger. Managing this duality is one of the most fundamental challenges of human organization.
What Breaks When This Is Violated
Too closed: Inbreeding (biological and cultural). The Hapsburg jaw. North Korean information isolation. Corporate echo chambers that innovate themselves into irrelevance.
Too open: Loss of social cohesion. Roman citizenship granted so broadly it became meaningless. Immigration rates that exceed integration capacity, generating backlash. Cultural relativism so extreme that no shared values remain to organize around.
Currently: Both violations simultaneously. Borders are open for capital and closed for people. Information flows freely but trust has evaporated. Cultures are globally connected but locally atomized. The boundary is neither permeable nor impermeable - it is selectively permeable to POWER and impermeable to PEOPLE.
The Principle
Every human system must maintain a selectively permeable boundary: open enough to receive what renews, closed enough to preserve what sustains. The stranger must be possible but not mandatory. Integration must be available but not coerced. Complete closure is death by stagnation. Complete openness is death by dissolution.
PRINCIPLE VII: MEANING MUST BE GENERATED, NOT IMPOSED
What the Evidence Shows
Yuval Harari, building on decades of cognitive and evolutionary anthropology, identified the unique human capacity: shared fiction. Humans can cooperate in groups far exceeding Dunbar’s Number because they share beliefs in things that don’t physically exist: nations, money, corporations, gods, human rights, laws.
These are not lies. They are coordination technologies. Money works because everyone agrees it works. A nation exists because its citizens believe it exists. Human rights protect because people fight for them. The fiction becomes real through collective commitment.
But there is a crucial distinction between meaning that is generated and meaning that is imposed.
Generated meaning emerges from people’s actual experience, relationships, and choices. It is owned by those who create it. The bond between parents and children is generated meaning. A community garden is generated meaning. A scientific discovery is generated meaning.
Imposed meaning is delivered from above and enforced through power. State propaganda is imposed meaning. Mandatory ideology is imposed meaning. An algorithm that tells you what to care about is imposed meaning.
The anthropological evidence is clear: generated meaning sustains. Imposed meaning requires escalating force to maintain.
Every religion that lasted did so because ordinary people found genuine meaning in its practices - not because authorities forced compliance. Every religion that relied on forced compliance eventually lost its practitioners or devolved into empty ritual. Every political system that generated genuine patriotism outlasted those that imposed it.
What Breaks When This Is Violated
- Soviet communism: Meaning imposed by state. Required escalating censorship, imprisonment, and surveillance to maintain. Collapsed when the force relaxed.
- Consumer capitalism: Meaning generated by advertising (you are what you buy). Generates escalating dissatisfaction by design - you must always need the next thing. Result: epidemic of anxiety, depression, and meaninglessness in the wealthiest societies in history.
- Algorithmic meaning: Social media algorithms determine what you see, what outrages you, what you “care about.” Meaning is not generated by your experience but optimized by an algorithm for engagement. Result: people feel simultaneously overstimulated and empty. Lots of opinions, no convictions.
- Techno-utopianism: Meaning imposed through narrative of inevitable progress. “Technology will solve everything.” When it doesn’t, the disillusionment is total.
The Principle
Meaning must be generated from lived experience, not imposed by authority or algorithm. Systems that generate meaning create loyalty. Systems that impose meaning create compliance. Compliance requires escalating force. Loyalty does not.
The most dangerous moment for any civilization is when it can no longer generate meaning for the majority of its participants. At that point, the alternatives become: imposed meaning (authoritarianism), purchased meaning (consumerism), algorithmic meaning (digital control), or no meaning at all (nihilism). None of these are stable.
THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES - SUMMARY
Derived from anthropological evidence, evolutionary biology, and socioeconomic observation across 300,000 years of human history:
| # | Principle | Source | Species-Level Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Reciprocity | Mauss (1925), universal ethnographic evidence | Social bonding through mutual obligation. Without it: extraction, disintegration |
| II | The Leveling Mechanism | Boehm (1999), hunter-gatherer studies | Active suppression of concentration. Without it: tyranny (every time) |
| III | The 150 Boundary | Dunbar (1992), 30+ years of validation | Abstractions must remain accountable to human-scale groups. Without it: capture |
| IV | Embedded Economy | Polanyi (1944), economic anthropology | Economy must serve society, not the reverse. Without it: disembedding -> crisis -> violent re-embedding |
| V | Anti-Structure | Turner (1969), ritual studies | Periodic dissolution of hierarchy renews social bonds. Without it: brittle systems that shatter |
| VI | The Permeable Boundary | Universal ethnographic evidence | Open enough to renew, closed enough to cohere. Without it: stagnation or dissolution |
| VII | Generated Meaning | Cognitive anthropology, Harari, universal evidence | Meaning must emerge from experience, not be imposed by power. Without it: compliance that collapses when force relaxes |
THE META-PATTERN
All seven principles share a structural pattern: they are tensions, not positions.
- Reciprocity is a tension between giving and receiving
- Leveling is a tension between individual ambition and collective welfare
- The 150 Boundary is a tension between scale and accountability
- Embeddedness is a tension between economic efficiency and social cohesion
- Anti-Structure is a tension between order and renewal
- The Boundary is a tension between openness and closure
- Meaning is a tension between autonomy and shared narrative
No principle resolves into a fixed position. Anyone who says “the answer is complete openness” has violated Principle VI. Anyone who says “the answer is total equality” has misunderstood Principle II (which is about MECHANISM, not outcome). Anyone who says “the answer is small communities” has violated the scaling insight of Principle III.
The principles are not destinations. They are ongoing balancing acts. The civilization that survives is not the one that finds the perfect position but the one that maintains the ability to ADJUST.
This is the deepest insight from 300,000 years of evidence: human systems don’t fail because they reach the wrong answer. They fail because they stop being able to adjust. The Roman Empire didn’t fall because it was evil. It fell because it became rigid. The Soviet Union didn’t fall because communism is theoretically wrong. It fell because the system could no longer adjust to reality.
The highest principle is not any single rule. It is the capacity to keep adjusting.
Any system that becomes too rigid to adjust - whether through dogma, through concentration of power, through algorithmic lock-in, through biometric identity infrastructure, or through the simple human preference for comfort over truth - is dying. It may take decades or centuries. But the diagnosis is already written.
APPLICATION: THE TECHNATE VS. THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES
| Principle | Technate Violation | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| I: Reciprocity | Value extracted from labor (productivity-wage gap). Attention extracted by algorithms. Data extracted from bodies (iris scans). Nothing proportional returned. | CRITICAL |
| II: Leveling | Leveling mechanisms systematically disabled: free press undermined, unions weakened, elections captured (Citizens United), DOGE dismantling government oversight. No mechanism remains except revolution. | CRITICAL |
| III: 150 Boundary | Abstractions (AI, algorithms, financial instruments) operating far beyond any human’s understanding or oversight. No accountability to human-scale groups. | CRITICAL |
| IV: Embeddedness | Economy fully disembedded: labor commodified (gig economy), identity commodified (World ID), attention commodified (social media), governance commodified (political donations). Most extreme disembedding in history. | CRITICAL |
| V: Anti-Structure | No liminal spaces remaining. Always-on culture. Digital mediation of all experience. Festival reduced to consumption event. Ritual reduced to Instagram post. | HIGH |
| VI: Boundary | Selectively permeable to capital, impermeable to people. Open borders for money, closed borders for refugees. Ideas filtered by algorithm, not by community discernment. | HIGH |
| VII: Meaning | Meaning imposed by algorithm (what to care about), by consumption (you are what you buy), by progress narrative (technology will save us). Very little generated from lived experience. | CRITICAL |
Five of seven at CRITICAL. Two at HIGH. Zero principles maintained.
No civilization in the anthropological record has survived violating all of its structural principles simultaneously. The question is not whether correction will come. It is what form the correction takes: reform, revolution, or collapse.
WHAT MUST BE BUILT
If these seven principles are accurate - if they describe what the species actually requires - then any post-Technate system must be engineered to contain them:
-
Reciprocity by design: Economic systems where value returns to those who create it. Not through redistribution alone but through structural design: co-operatives, profit-sharing, community currencies, commons-based production.
-
Active leveling: Not equality of outcome but functional mechanisms that prevent excessive concentration. Progressive taxation is a leveling mechanism. Antitrust law is a leveling mechanism. Public ridicule of arrogance is a leveling mechanism. The question is not whether to level but which mechanisms to use.
-
Human-scale accountability: Every institution, every algorithm, every financial instrument must be comprehensible and challengeable by groups of actual humans who know each other. Ostrom’s eight principles are the design handbook.
-
Re-embedded economy: Economy that serves social relationships, not the reverse. This doesn’t mean abolishing markets. It means markets where you can see who made the thing, where the workers are paid fairly, where the environmental cost is included in the price, and where the financial system serves production rather than cannibalizing it.
-
Built-in anti-structure: Mandatory sabbath. Real festivals. Rites of passage. Spaces where hierarchy is suspended and people encounter each other as equals. Not as therapy but as structural maintenance.
-
Permeable boundaries: Communities that welcome strangers through structured integration, not forced assimilation or total exclusion. At every level: neighborhood, city, nation, civilization.
-
Meaning generated from below: Education that produces thinkers, not consumers. Media that reflects experience, not algorithms. Governance that emerges from participation, not imposition. Technology that amplifies human choice, not replaces it.
These are not utopian demands. They are engineering specifications. Ignore them and the system fails. Every time. The anthropological record is as reliable as gravity.
por. Zbigniew Pattern recognition, not prophecy April 1, 2026
These principles were not written by any one mind. They were written by 300,000 years of human trial and error - by every society that flourished and every one that collapsed. The evidence is in the bones, the villages, the trade routes, the ritual sites, and the ruins. We didn’t invent these principles. We discovered them. The question is whether we’ll honor them.
| *Previous: The Currency Prison | The Highest Principles | The Technate Network* |