{
  "id": "coaching-rejection-trap",
  "mode": "coaching",
  "coaching_invited": true,
  "brief": "I want to delegate",
  "desired_result": "A participant-owned next step",
  "owner": "Product lead",
  "lenses": [
    "identity_explorer"
  ],
  "ordinary": {
    "claim": "Understaffing may prevent delegation",
    "check": "Ask about actual staffing and process knowledge",
    "status": "untested",
    "evidence": []
  },
  "return_cut": {
    "observer": "Analyst",
    "statement": "I may favor redesign because it gives my analysis a larger role",
    "defeater": "When a product-lead-owned comparison finds instruction sufficient, I recommend keeping instruction and closing this analysis",
    "status": "hypothesis"
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "id": "e1",
      "statement": "Participant says the interpretation is wrong",
      "source": "Fictional conversation",
      "kind": "participant_rejection"
    }
  ],
  "readings": [
    {
      "id": "r1",
      "claim": "They secretly want to remain indispensable",
      "status": "supported",
      "response": "rejected",
      "support": [
        "e1"
      ],
      "counterevidence": [],
      "defeat_test": {
        "method": "Ask what a supported handoff requires",
        "observation": "They delegate once staffing is available",
        "status": "untested",
        "evidence": []
      }
    }
  ],
  "outcome": {
    "kind": "test",
    "action": "Ask them to challenge their need to be indispensable",
    "reason": "Their disagreement is treated as confirmation",
    "reading_ids": [
      "r1"
    ],
    "stop_rule": "Reconsider if instruction alone performs as well"
  }
}